Home > Knowledge Base > Assignment Samples > Sample Masters Project Management Assignment

Sample Masters Project Management Assignment

Published by at December 13th, 2022 , Revised On January 26, 2023

Here is a sample that showcases why we are one of the world’s leading academic writing firms. This assignment was created by one of our UK assignment writers and demonstrated the highest academic quality. Place your order today to achieve academic greatness.

Sodor project management


This paper is an exhaustive investigation of the venture of the executives of the task at the Sodor Oil Terminal, including project design and execution. Sodor is a multi-supporter activity involving numerous pupils of designing, for example, structural designing, underlying designing, mechanical designing, electrical designing, firefighting and working of planes.

This incorporates a venture director who is more than a structural designer but has insight in different angles, for example, HR, monetary bookkeeping, time the board, a combination of the executives, sourcing of cost the board and quality administration (Edum-Fotwe, 2000).

The paper gives a basic assessment of the association of venture authority by the group. It likewise tended to how the group dealt with the task from start to finish. The instruments, techniques and systems utilized in the task are likewise examined. After the group was set up, the association of the administration of the Sodor project by Team One started, and the real task contextual analysis was acquired the multi-week before the undertaking started. To effectively deal with this venture, the group began by considering the contextual task analysis and distinguished its order in this undertaking.

Project planning stage – Session 1

The use of the plan, arranging and development of the Sodor Oil Terminal started with the task group’s definition. In Session 1, Project Brief, the venture order and the power to begin the task were gotten. A paper was drawn up by the group illustrating how the group wanted to execute the proposition.

The Sodor project outline has been recorded in this paper. Notwithstanding, the Project Initiation Paper [PID] precluded fundamental documentation, for example, a business case, which is an imperative archive for any task since it delineates the benefits of the undertaking.

In the wake of perusing the undertaking brief and allotting assignments to the four colleagues, the group set up the task plan utilizing MS Project at the weekly meeting. Occupation Break down Structure [WBS] activity readiness mode was utilized hypothetically reformist by arranging exercises. Comparable assignments were frequently bunched for each stage under indicated stage headings with clear terms.

Nonetheless, there was no data about providers and contract-based workers at this stage, so the asset use sheet in the MS venture couldn’t be loaded up with complete undertaking information. A benchmark has been put something aside for the venture plan. To oversee, control and track the venture, the benchmark is fundamental.

The undertaking plan was created given the information introduced in brief in Session One. Assignments, their expenses and estimated length in weeks and the request wherein such errands were to be finished were the subtleties introduced. The capacities and their archetypes were allotted in their consecutive request. Such cutoff times, for example, ‘Undertaking Launch’,’ Board Acceptance’ and ‘End of Project’, were likewise allotted to the task plan.

The task plan was saved as ‘Meeting 1.1-Original Benchmark’ for a ‘Unique Baseline’ was done. The group built up the Cost Model and a Critical Path from the saved undertaking plan that was caught against the underlying benchmark. Notwithstanding, it was not practical to choose if the expense was past the assigned financial plan if no spending plan was apportioned. With project stages alluded to as stages that permit the venture supervisor to deal with the task, the last undertaking was planned. In Bosnia and Herzegovina, during the survey of tasks the executives in building projects,

For meeting 1, the underlying undertaking plan had a general task time of 111.5 weeks beginning on 7 June 2021 and an expense of £ 5,781,000.

Project initiation- stage 2

The usage of the undertaking endless supply of meeting 2 of the venture brief, which included more task detail, for example, seller data, additional costs, the necessary normal length of the task of 98 weeks, the motivator because of requirement and the discipline for rebelliousness with the venture term. After the group’s conversations at the subsequent task meeting, it was concluded that to urge the group to execute the subsequent meeting, it was critical to pick the providers, the requirement for a technique and necessities for merchant choice.

Duties were characterized and chosen, the group chief sent the work unit to the group for meeting 2, and the assignments were appointed as every individual performed Vendor choice from the task group. The group chose an examination condition. The score sheet of the seller examination was organized to quantify the merchant’s dependent on acknowledged credits. In light of their importance, the credits were weighted as follows:

Position [Country] = Rating x 3.3

percent Price = Rating x 10.0 percent

Delivery time = Rating x 13.3 percent

Provider Rating = Rating x 6.7 percent

The rating for each trait depended on a Likert scale going from 0 to 3, where0 = most exceedingly awful and 3= most elevated. The amount of the things are applied, and the delicate is granted to the merchant with the most noteworthy score. Each piece of the group evaluated every provider of materials and every contractual worker.

For each property, the positioning depended on a Likert scale with a rating of 0 to 3, where 0= most noticeably terrible and 3= most noteworthy. The amount of the merchandise is summed up, and the delicate was granted to the seller with the most noteworthy score. Each group member scored every supplier of material and every temporary worker.

The undertaking plan was likewise changed with the expense and span subtleties of all the picked supply providers and contractual workers until the providers were chosen and given an honor letter joined by an agreement. As a marketable strategy, the undertaking plan was saved – 2.1 Session ‘Baseline2’ (preceding extra time) and another of ‘Benchmark 3: Baseline 3′(after additional time). The Session 2 merchandise were Vendor Selection Process Paper, Matrix Document for Vendor Selection, Revised Project Proposals, Environmental Impact Assessment[EIA], and Session Cost Model2.

Controlling the Stage – The 2nd session

The venture plan was adjusted and refreshed with all the new proof after the local area evaluation of Session 1 and amendments were discovered. The undertaking length stretched from 111.5 weeks to 142.7 weeks at the expense of £ 6,252,433.75. The group brought down the task time by applying some additional time as a component of undertaking control, which brought the term down to 96.7 weeks at the expense of £ 6,603,028.75.

Since adding the additional time with ‘Pattern 3’, the current undertaking plan was saved. It likewise changed the cost model and assessed the fluctuation. In meeting 2, the significant review assignments for the task are Project Start, Head Office Work, Board Acceptance, Jetty Design, Tank Design, Material Supply, Fabrication, Implementation, Testing, Painting and Project Finish.

The degree to which additional time is utilized in this undertaking isn’t determined because the venture has no spending limits. The group consented to keep the length of the task well under 98 weeks altogether, not to additional raise costs by additional lessening the time.

Management of Stage Boundary – 2 and 3 sessions

In a task plan, the stage limit is the time between two simultaneous meetings. Stage limit control implies following the venture by standing out the past stage from the real undertaking timetable to the normal one. The stage limit additionally requires adding limitations to a flee project that helps keep the undertaking on target regarding cost, project length and scale under affirmed limits.

Additionally, the advantage examination is completed, and a therapeutic move is made. Spontaneous venture end is likely if, after executing controls, the task turns out to be non-feasible and the undertaking gets unreasonable. The cost model is updated during the stage limit, and the cost vulnerability diverges from the appraisals of the foreseen business situation.

Controls help keep the venture back on track during stage limit the executives. Any challenges are found, discussed, and contemplated when the timetable for the following meeting is created. The group made a complete timetable for meeting 3 in the wake of following and overseeing meeting 2, which incorporated all the essential changes, all new activity focuses, and new expenses and assets. The undertaking schedule was saved as a ‘3.1 meeting’.

Controlling the Stage– Session 3

The group handled all the shortcomings discovered during the starter meeting after the stage of the board. With an updated project plan, the group got the undertaking preparation for meeting 3. The new short has one new errand; temporary electrical workers, painters, and mechanical get-together preparation.

The group actualized the new exercises and the board and modified the Session 3 task plan with the new determinations. What’s more, the arrangement for the undertaking is put away as Session 3.1.– And for a pattern. The cost model was likewise a date put something aside for every past benchmark and saved.

The length of the task diminished to 92.7 weeks, and the cost additionally diminished to £ 6,156,833.00. Since executing slippage just as the cover of the two shipments for the acquisition of lines by 25%, the vital supporter of the decrease of both length and cost was that.

Management of Stage Boundary –3 and 4 sessions

Meeting 3 issues were characterized and discussed, so the group made a venture plan for meeting 4 that assembles all task changes with their going with tasks and stores the undertaking plan as Session 4.1 and makes a cost model. Meeting 4 venture preparation was acquired by the group. Altered the undertaking plan as ‘Meeting Saved 4.1 ‘. The cost model is additionally worked to show the expenses at the ideal opportunity for every gauge and the differences for every segment, just as the whole project.

Controlling the Stage – Session 4

The group handled all the shortcomings discovered during the primer meeting after stage the board. For a changed undertaking plan, and with 25 weeks, Session 4 is into the venture. If they had low scores, for example, 0 or 1, the item producers and contractual workers have some slippage time, so on the off chance that they were positioned 3, they would be no slippage, so sellers appraised 4 they would be in front of the timetable.

To urge them to recuperate providing time, there was a decision between paying providers either 5 percent or 25 percent. The group did a money-saving advantage examination and found that the other option (a) they will pay 5 percent premium is the correct choice.

These progressions were incorporated in the bundle that was put aside for a standard as Session 4.1. During every benchmark, the cost model was likewise worked to catch costs. From 92.7 weeks in meeting 3, the venture length changed insignificantly to 95.40 weeks, while the cost rose to £ 6,481,634.75.

Regulation of Level – Session 5

When stage limit control from Session 4 to 5 was done, and the task brief for Session 5 was gotten, all issues found in the past meeting were amended by the venture group and the most recent upgrades in the undertaking brief were likewise presented. Meeting 5 is week 45 into the undertaking.

Due to the choice of Mitsui, who is a rating 2 as a provider to supply line and valve, the undertaking additionally postponed the decision of Saipan as a rating 2 provider to do the Jetty by about fourteen days. The task was deferred by about a month and a half more. This drove the length of the task to increment to 100.29 weeks and the cost to increment to £ 6,591,032.00.

The group consented to add some additional time to different undertakings on the pivotal course to lighten this, and the task diminished to 77.05 weeks at the expense of £ 6,806,273.37. The choice of utilizing a lot of extra time was to cater for meeting 6 with the goal that the multi-week stipend would be in handy on the off chance of further slippage. The group modified the undertaking timetable and cost model and saved the proposition as meeting 6.1.

Regulation of the Stage – Session 6

The project was still complete at this stage, but the final project length rose to 95.74 weeks and the final cost to £ 6,514,468.14 after a delay due to vendor ranking for implementation. The project was also less than the preferred 98-week duration. However, as no budget is committed, there are no comparative expenses.

A Project Closure

The venture end measure starts with the Project Manager telling the task board that the undertaking is prepared for fulfilment. The task supervisor is needed to give up the undertaking to its chief. The papers to be turned over by the venture supervisor are the underlying undertaking usage paper, the task plan, specifically the first and last, the library of challenges and the exercises log.

These records will permit the venture board to survey how well the task has been. It is possessed and prepared upon the board’s permission for shutting. The group made an undertaking end. Because of the absence of a timetable, it is one of three drivers (Budget, Time and Scope) for an excellent item, with the expansion of a Benefit examination.


The Sodor project was a colossal task, including multi-discipline groups that elaborate a ton of group gatherings on the field. Yet, the group had extremely restricted contact with the creation groups in the present circumstance. (Edum-Fotwe, 2000) The nonattendance of a spending plan was a critical stream in this task since three things followed cost (financial plan), time and unpredictability (highlights objectives) for the venture group to deal with the undertaking progress.

The group didn’t do an extensive advantage investigation plan, so the undertaking was driven exclusively by degree and length. It is suggested that a particularly significant exercise ought to be done in a close. The undertaking brief proposed that the Project Manager was knowledgeable in underlying designing, steel, and electrical works, which couldn’t be the situation.

Eventually, before the task started, the primary execution measurements were more likely than not to be caught. These will be debilitating guidelines for one or the other purpose of the task. It will likewise assist with following and incorporating the important and proper controls to keep the venture on course.

In the equipped venture, the board is prescribed to be given to tasks of such size. The board’s utilization of talented development projects, known as Construction Supervision (CS), was actualized in 1998 because of the fast development of the development business in China (Liu, 2004).

Appendix 1- Original Baseline

Appendix 1- Original Baseline

Appendix 2- Closeout plan

Appendix 2- Closeout plan


Edum-Fotwe, F.T., and McCaffer, R. (2000) International Journal of Project Management 18 pp. 111-124 Developing project management competency: perspectives from the construction industry.

Kaiser, M.G., Arbi, F.E., and Ahlemann, F. (2014) Successful project portfolio management beyond project selection techniques: Understanding the role of structural alignment International Journal of Project Management

Kartama, N.A. (2001) Corresponding author contact information, E-mail the corresponding author, Saied A. Kartamb Risk and its management in the Kuwaiti construction industry: a contractors’ perspective International Journal of Project Management Volume 19, Issue 6, August 2001, pp. 325 –335

Liu, G., Shen, Q., and Shen, L. (2004) Factors constraining the development of professional project management in China’s construction industry, International Journal of Project Management 22 pp. 203– 211.

Ljevoa, Ž., Vukomanoviü, M. (2014) Project Management practised in Public Project Stream of Bosnia and Herzegovina, Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences 119 pp. 692 – 701.

Lyons, T., Skitmore, M. (2004) Project risk management in the Queensland engineering construction industry: a survey International Journal of Project Management 22 pp.51– 61

Pheng, S. (1998) Back to the basics: biblical wisdom for effective construction project management, Low International Journal o/’ Project Management Vol. 16, No. 4, pp. 209 214,

Sambasivan, M., Soon, YW (2007) Causes and effects of delays in the Malaysian construction industry, International Journal of Project Management 25 pp. 517 – 526.

You May Also Like