Assignment Sample on Law of Organizations

Here is a sample that showcases why we are one of the world’s leading academic writing firms. This assignment was created by one of our UK assignment writers and demonstrated the highest academic quality. Place your order today to achieve academic greatness.

Law of Organizations

Governance in any organization is key in ensuring that the company’s goals and objectives are achieved at the set time and period. Poor governance always weakens the company’s potential capability to increase production output. When there is good governance, efficiency and effectiveness are on the road to achieving the goals and objectives, which always become easier due to several factors.

Teamwork is essential because the company members make collective strategies for achieving the goals and make amicable solutions due to effective decision-making. Effective communication is also a factor that is paramount in the growth and development of any organization, which creates a healthy and conducive environment for work. Competitive and experienced workers are key because it helps in critical and creative thinking, which is always important for innovation and new strategies. A poorly governed company suffers financially, which can only take effective leadership to get out of themes.

A few key reasons businesses need to follow the contract and corporate principles. Having a contract provides certainty and clarity for all parties involved in a business transaction. This means there is a reduced risk of misunderstanding or disputes arising, saving the business time and money. Secondly, following corporate principles ensures the business is run fairly and transparently.

This promotes confidence and trust in the business from both customers and suppliers and can help to build long-term relationships. Thirdly, adhering to contract and corporate principles can help to protect the business from legal risks. For example, if a contract is not properly written or signed, it may not be legally binding.

This could leave the business open to claims or disputes. Finally, businesses have many benefits from following contracts and corporate principles. By doing so, businesses can operate more efficiently and effectively and reduce the risk of legal issues arising.

Several contract and corporate principles underpin the creation and running of business organizations in the United Kingdom. They are as follows: The principle of freedom of contract: This principle states that parties to a contract are free to determine the terms of their agreement and that the courts will not intervene to change those terms. This principle is based on the notion of freedom of contract, a cornerstone of the common law system.

This principle has been codified in the Contracts Act of 1979, which states that “parties to a contract are free to determine its terms, and the courts will not intervene to change those terms.” It is important to businesses in the UK because it provides certainty and predictability in contractual relationships. It also promotes economic efficiency by allowing businesses to tailor their contracts to specific needs. This principle is enshrined in the UK’s Companies Act 2006.

The principle of corporate personality states that a company is a legal entity separate from its shareholders. This means the company can enter into contracts, own property, and be sued in its name. This principle is also enshrined in the UK’s Companies Act 2006. The principle of corporate personality is the legal concept that a corporation, as a separate and distinct entity from its owners, has certain rights and responsibilities distinct from its shareholders.

This principle is the foundation for many corporate legal rules. It allows corporations to enter into contracts, own property, and be sued in their name. One of the most important consequences of the corporate personality principle is that shareholders are not liable for the debts and obligations of the corporation. This limited liability protection is one of the key reasons that corporations exist.

It allows investors to put money into a business without fearing they will be held personally responsible if it fails. Another important consequence of the corporate personality principle is that corporations have perpetual existence. This means a corporation can continue to exist even if its shareholders die or sell their shares. This is important for businesses that want to pass on to future generations. The corporate personality principle is a critical part of the legal framework governing businesses in the United Kingdom. Without this principle, businesses would be much riskier and less attractive to investors.

The principle of limited liability states that shareholders of a company are only liable for the amount of money they have invested in the company. They cannot be held responsible for the company’s debts. This principle is also enshrined in the UK’s Companies Act 2006.

It is a legal principle that protects individuals from being held personally responsible for the debts and liabilities of a business organization. In the United Kingdom, this principle is enshrined in the Companies Act of 2006. Under this law, shareholders of a company are only liable for the company’s debts up to the amount of their investment. This means that if a company goes bankrupt, shareholders will only lose the money they invested in the company and will not be held personally responsible for its debts.

This principle protects investors and encourages entrepreneurship by limiting the risks of starting a new business. The principle has come under criticism in recent years, as some argue that it allows business owners to take excessive risks without consequences. Critics also point to the 2008 financial crisis, when many banks and other financial institutions went bankrupt despite having limited liability. However, the principle of limited liability remains an important part of the legal framework of business organizations in the United Kingdom.

The principle of shareholder primacy: This principle states that the primary purpose of a company is to maximize shareholder value. This means that the company should make decisions that will result in the greatest return for shareholders. The principle of shareholder primacy is the belief that the primary purpose of a company is to generate returns for shareholders.

This principle is evident in how businesses are run in the United Kingdom, where companies focus on maximizing profits and shareholder value. This principle can be seen in how companies are structured and governed. For example, the board of directors is typically responsible for making decisions that are in the best interests of shareholders. This includes decisions about strategy, investments, and dividends.

Also, executive compensation is often linked to performance measures designed to benefit shareholders. The principle of shareholder primacy can also be seen in how companies communicate with shareholders. For example, companies often release financial results focused on shareholder returns. They may also hold shareholder conferences or webcasts to update the company’s performance and plans.

The principle of shareholder primacy has come under criticism in recent years. Some believe it can lead to short-term thinking and decisions, not in the best interests of other stakeholders, such as employees, customers, and the community. However, shareholder primacy remains the dominant philosophy of business in the United Kingdom.

The principle of directors’ duties: This principle states that directors of a company have a duty to act in the company’s best interests. They must make decisions that are in the company’s best interests, not themselves or any other party. This principle is enshrined in the UK’s Companies Act 2006. The first duty is to promote the company’s success for its shareholders’ benefit. This means that the directors must make decisions that are in the company’s and its shareholders’ best interests rather than in their or other stakeholders’ interests.

The second duty is to exercise reasonable care, skill and diligence. This means that the directors must ensure they have the skills and knowledge necessary to make informed decisions and take care to avoid making mistakes. The third duty is to avoid conflicts of interest. This means that the directors must not put themselves in a position where they could benefit from a decision they make on behalf of the company or where their interests could conflict with those of the company. The fourth duty is not to accept benefits from third parties.

This means that the directors must not accept any payments or other benefits from anyone who could benefit from a decision they make on behalf of the company. The fifth duty is to declare interests in proposed transactions or arrangements. This means that the directors must disclose their interests in any proposed transactions or arrangements that could affect the company.

The principle of disclosure: This principle states that companies must disclose material information to shareholders. Shareholders must be given information that could reasonably affect their decision-making. This principle is also enshrined in the UK’s Companies Act 2006.

The disclosure principle is a cornerstone of business organizations in the United Kingdom. It requires that organizations make certain information available to the public to ensure transparency and accountability. This principle is enshrined in law through the Companies Act 2006, which sets out the specific information companies must disclose. This includes information on the company’s shareholders, directors, and financial performance. Also, it applies to other business entities, such as partnerships and limited liability partnerships.

These organizations must disclose information on their partners and financial performance. Disclosure of this information allows the public to make informed decisions about whether to do business with a particular organization. It also helps to ensure that organizations are accountable for their actions and transparent dealings.

The principle of corporate governance states that companies must have systems and processes in place to ensure that the company is run efficiently and effectively. This means that the board of directors must be accountable to shareholders and that there must be transparency in the decision-making process.

A number of principles of corporate governance underpin the creation and running of business organizations in the United Kingdom. These principles include the need for transparency and accountability, the need for effective and independent board oversight, and the need for shareholder engagement.

Transparency and accountability are essential in ensuring that businesses are run fairly and accountable. All businesses should disclose material information promptly and accurately and be open and transparent in their dealings with shareholders, employees, customers, and other stakeholders. An effective and independent board of directors is essential in providing oversight of a company’s affairs.

The board should be composed of individuals with the appropriate skills and experience to provide effective oversight and be independent of management. Shareholder engagement is important in ensuring that shareholders have a say in how their company is run. Shareholders should be allowed to vote on significant matters and should be able to engage with the board regularly.

The principle of stakeholder management: This principle states that companies must consider all stakeholders’ interests when making decisions. This means that the company must consider the impact of its decisions on employees, suppliers, customers, and the community. A variety of stakeholders are involved in creating and running business organizations in the United Kingdom.

These stakeholders include shareholders, employees, customers, suppliers, and the government. It is that all of these groups should be considered when making decisions about the organization. The goal is to balance the interests of all stakeholders to create the most value for the organization. For example, when deciding whether to invest in new equipment, the shareholders may want the organization to prioritize profit growth.

However, the employees may want the organization to prioritize job security. The customers may want the organization to prioritize quality products. And the suppliers may want the organization to prioritize on-time payments.

The principle of stakeholder management is to consider all of these interests and make the best decision for the organization as a whole. This may mean making trade-offs between stakeholders, but the goal is to create the most value for the organization.

In conclusion, a business organization should be created for carrying on a business, not for any other purpose. The business organization should be run following sound business principles and not for any other purpose. The business organization should be operated for the benefit of its shareholders and not for the benefit of any other group or individual.

The business organization should be operated according to the law and not violate any applicable laws. The business organization should be operated in a manner which is fair to all concerned and not in a manner which is unfair to any particular group or individual.

References

De Silva, M., & Wright, M. (2019). Entrepreneurial co‐creation: societal impact through open innovation. R&D Management, 49(3), 318-342.

Donaghey, J., & Reinecke, J. (2018). When industrial democracy meets corporate social responsibility—A comparison of the Bangladesh accord and alliance as responses to the Rana Plaza disaster. British Journal of Industrial Relations, 56(1), 14-42.

Elg, U., Ghauri, P. N., Child, J., & Collinson, S. (2017). MNE microfoundations and routines for building a legitimate and sustainable position in emerging markets. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 38(9), 1320-1337.

Fussler, C., Cramer, A., & Van der Vegt, S. (2017). Raising the bar: Creating value with the UN Global Compact. Routledge.

Geddes, M. (2017). Making public private partnerships work: Building relationships and understanding cultures. Routledge.

Malik, A., Pereira, V., & Budhwar, P. (2018). Value creation and capture through human resource management practices: Gazing through the business model lens. Organizational Dynamics, 47(3), 180-188.

Moisander, J., Groß, C., & Eräranta, K. (2018). Mechanisms of biopower and neoliberal governmentality in precarious work: Mobilizing the dependent self-employed as independent business owners. Human Relations, 71(3), 375-398.

Pedersen, E. R. G., Gwozdz, W., & Hvass, K. K. (2018). Exploring the relationship between business model innovation, corporate sustainability, and organisational values within the fashion industry. Journal of business ethics, 149(2), 267-284.

Rae, K., Sands, J., & Subramaniam, N. (2017). Associations among the five components within COSO internal control-integrated framework as the underpinning of quality corporate governance. Australasian Accounting, Business and Finance Journal, 11(1), 28-54.

Warren, A., & Gibson, C. (2017). Subcultural enterprises, brand value, and limits to financialized growth: The rise and fall of corporate surfing brands. Geoforum, 86, 177-187.

Frequently Asked Questions