Sample Masters Early Child Education Report

Here is a sample that showcases why we are one of the world’s leading academic writing firms. This assignment was created by one of our expert academic writers and demonstrated the highest academic quality. Place your order today to achieve academic greatness.

Evaluating the policy of child punishment to support the promotion of positive behavior to correct behavior:

A comparison between the UK and Saudi Arabia policies

Introduction

The following report plan is prepared to critically evaluate the topic relating to the policy of child punishment to support the promotion of positive behavior to correct behavior.

To better understand the topic, a compare and contrast approach is used while referring to the UK and Saudi Arabia policies. To provide arguments in a comprehensive plan, the following paper presents a structured outline to direct writing a quality paper for the final report.

Overview of the Corporal Punishment

Every year many students experience corporal punishment in public schools particularly. Regardless of the issues related to the hitting or beating of learners, child punishment is a legal kind of school discipline in many states of the world (Romano et al., 2015).

Child discipline is the means applied to avoid potential behavioral issues among children. The term ‘discipline’ is outlined as communicating knowledge and skills, in other terms, to instruct the children.

The following section of the paper will outline the concept of child punishment while supporting arguments with relevant child behavioral theories and frameworks.

Impact of Child Punishment on Academic Success

It has been found that learners of colour and with certain disabilities are unreasonably subjected to a child or corporal punishment, impeding their access to a positive learning environment within the educational setting (Clark, 2015).

Child punishment leads to an adverse impact on academic success as it greatly disrupts the routine functioning of young learners and negatively influences their cognitive development.

This heading will bring to attention the aftermaths of child punishment and how poorly it can ruin the educational career of affected ones.

Contrast and Comparison Approach: Policy of the UK and Saudi Arabia

To correct a child’s behavior, it is essential to devise policies at an international level, which should promote the healthy growth of learners and impart positive knowledge among them.

The UN Convention on Child Rights is a policy framework, which seeks to promote the civil, political, financial, social, and cultural protection of young people and protect them from unnecessary corporal punishment (Kimbrough-Melton and Melton, 2015).

This section forms an important part of the overall assignment where compare and contrast approach will be used to critically inspect the policy frameworks practiced in countries like the United Kingdom and Saudi Arabia.

Relevant similarities and differences between the policies of the two nations will be discussed to better understand the measures of correcting child behavior.

Recommendations and Conclusion

It is advisable to introduce and enact policies at the federal level banning disciplinary measures in schools. It is also recommended to promote positive behaviors among children while providing teachers and caregivers with the necessary tools to create a secure environment for learners.

It would be the last section of the final paper where all ideas (presented in the overall report) would be summarised to highlight the relevance of the topic under discussion while suggesting relevant recommendations for the target audience.

References

Clark, R.M., 2015. Family life and school achievement: Why poor black children succeed or fail. University of Chicago Press.

Kimbrough-Melton, R.J. and Melton, G.B., 2015. Child protection policy. Oxford Textbook of Violence Prevention: Epidemiology, Evidence, and Policy, p.255.

Romano, E., Babchishin, L., Marquis, R. and Fréchette, S., 2015. Childhood maltreatment and educational outcomes. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 16(4), pp.418-437.