Common PhD Viva Questions with Answers for Students 

The Importance of Preparing for PhD Viva Questions

Examiners often use the viva to confirm that candidates understand their work thoroughly, can justify choices made during the research process, and can explain its relevance. 

Poor preparation can result in hesitation, vague answers, or missed opportunities to highlight the significance of the thesis. On the other hand, systematic preparation strengthens credibility, improves confidence, and reduces stress.

What Examiners Actually Look for in a Viva

Examiners assess:

• Original contribution to knowledge
• Coherence of arguments
• Depth of understanding of the field
• Methodological soundness
• Awareness of limitations
• Implications and potential applications

This means questions are not only about technical details but also about the bigger picture, such as how the work benefits academia, industry, or society.
 

Common PhD Viva Questions and Model Answers

Below is a selection of frequently asked viva questions with suggested directions for answering them.
 

1. How Have You Evaluated Your Work?

Examiners want evidence that your research has been tested rigorously. Instead of repeating methods, highlight how you validated results. For instance, explain statistical checks, reliability measures, or benchmarking against previous studies.

Answer Strategy:
“I evaluated my work by applying statistical tests to confirm reliability and by comparing the outcomes with similar studies in the field. This approach confirmed both accuracy and applicability.”

This approach is similar to learning how to evaluate sources in academic research, showing reliability and objectivity strengthens your defence.
 

2. What Are Your Key Findings?

This question examines clarity and focus. Provide three or four concise findings and avoid long explanations.

Answer Strategy:
“My key findings are:

1. The proposed model improves predictive accuracy by 15% compared to baseline methods.
   
2. The methodology can be applied to large-scale datasets with consistent results.
   
3. The study highlights a gap in industry practices that can be addressed with this framework.”

3. What Makes Your Work Original?

Originality is at the core of doctoral research. Candidates must demonstrate novelty either in methodology, application, or theoretical contribution.

Answer Strategy:
“The originality lies in combining X and Y approaches, which has not been attempted in this field before. This integration provides a new perspective and measurable improvement.”
 

4. How Do Your Findings Relate to Existing Literature?

This checks whether you have contextualised your research properly. Avoid vague comparisons; instead, cite specific studies and indicate alignment or contradiction.

Answer Strategy:
“My findings support Smith (2020), who identified similar patterns in a smaller dataset. However, they challenge Johnson (2019), who argued that these methods cannot be scaled effectively. This difference highlights the strength of my approach.”
 

5. What Are the Strongest and Weakest Parts of Your Research?

Examiners appreciate honesty. They expect candidates to acknowledge limitations without undermining the overall contribution.

Answer Strategy:
“The strongest part is the scalability of the method, proven through multiple applications. The limitation lies in the sample diversity, which I addressed by suggesting broader data collection for future research.”

6. Why Did You Choose This Topic?

Motivation and rationale are critical. A strong answer combines personal interest with academic or practical relevance.

Answer Strategy:
“I chose this topic because of the gap in existing research identified during my master’s study, and its direct application in [specific field]. It offers both academic contribution and practical benefits.”

Students struggling with topic selection can use dissertation topics and outline services to define a structured research direction from the beginning.
 

Methodology in Viva Questions

Methodological clarity is one of the most questioned areas in viva. Candidates must explain why certain methods were chosen over others and how these methods produced valid results.

Common Questions:

• Why did you choose this methodology? 
• What alternatives did you consider? 
• How do your methods relate to your conceptual framework?

A clear explanation demonstrates both technical competence and awareness of research design principles. For instance, using qualitative interviews may be justified if the research focuses on exploring human experiences, while quantitative approaches are essential for measuring performance metrics.
 

Linking Findings to Practical Relevance

Examiners often ask about the practical use of the research. Questions such as “Who will benefit from your findings?” or “What is the relevance to industry?” require answers that extend beyond academia.

Answer Strategy:
“My research benefits not only academic discourse but also industry applications, as the model can be integrated into current workflows to improve efficiency.”

This type of answer shows adaptability and impact, both of which are essential in doctoral research. 
 

Addressing Future Work and Limitations

Examiners often ask about the scope for future research. This assesses how well the candidate understands the limitations of their work and the potential for extension.

Common Questions:

• What future research would you propose?
  
• How would you extend your current work?
  
• What are the limitations of your study?

Answer Strategy:
“My research opens avenues for applying this model in other industries. The main limitation is the sample size, which can be expanded in future studies. I also suggest integrating this approach with emerging data analytics tools for broader applicability.”.

Reflecting on the Research Journey

Another category of viva questions relates to personal reflection and growth during the PhD. Examiners want to see that the candidate has matured as a researcher and can critically assess their own journey.

Common Questions:

• How has your view of the topic changed during the research?
  
• What would you do differently if you were to start again?
  
• What advice would you give to a new researcher in this field?

Answer Strategy:
“Initially, I viewed the topic as a narrow technical challenge. Over time, I realised its broader implications and interdisciplinary potential. If I were to start again, I would allocate more time to stakeholder interviews to capture diverse perspectives.”

Such answers demonstrate reflection, growth, and an ability to learn from experience, qualities examiners value highly.
 

Understanding the Examiner’s Perspective

PhD examiners are experienced researchers tasked with evaluating whether the thesis meets the standards of doctoral research. Their questions are not designed to confuse but to confirm:

• The thesis is original
• The candidate understands and can justify their choices
• The contribution is significant and well-supported

Understanding this perspective helps candidates prepare better. Instead of fearing challenging questions, view them as opportunities to clarify and strengthen arguments.
 

Summary Table of Common Viva Questions and Answer Strategies

Closing Notes on Viva Preparation

Passing a PhD viva is a major academic achievement, it demands a clear understanding of the research, the ability to defend it under scrutiny, and awareness of its broader relevance.

All set to strengthen your viva preparation? Reach out to Essays UK for expert guidance on literature review vs systematic review, appendices support, and academic writing formatting tailored to your thesis. With the right preparation, you’ll be ready to take the final step toward earning your doctorate with distinction.

Frequently Asked Questions